Showing posts with label Sports. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sports. Show all posts

Monday, 25 December 2017

About Basketball!

About Basketball

The History of basketball begins with the invention of the game in 1891 in Springfield, Massachusetts. Dr James Naismith was the the originator of the Hoop and ball concept! Basketball is one of the world's most popular and widely viewed sports in 20th century! Infact, a lot of rules created on that day continue to exist even today!

Basketball is a sport played by two teams of five players on a rectangular court. The objective is to shoot a ball through a hoop of 18 inches (46 cm) in diameter and 10 feet (3.0 m) high mounted to a backboard at each end.

A team can score a field goal by shooting the ball through the basket during regular play. A field goal scores two points for the shooting team if a player is touching or closer to the basket than the three-point line, and three points (known commonly as a 3 pointer or three) if the player is behind the three-point line. The team with the most points at the end of the game wins

The ball can be advanced on the court by bouncing it (dribbling) while walking or running or throwing it to a team mate. As well as many techniques for shooting, passing, dribbling and rebounding, basketball has specialized player positions and offensive and defensive structures (player positioning).

A league created by Basketball Association of America in 1946 went on to be known as NBA (National Basketball Association) from 1949 onwards and has since been the most popular and toughest Basketball league in the world.

In India, the game of basketball started its journey in 1930 when it was played for the first time. The first Indian National Championship for men was conducted in 1934 in New Delhi. It has since become one of the more popular games in India. Indian Government has been continuously recognizing Basketball talent and conferring them with prestigious Arjuna and Dhanchand awards on a regular basis!

Prepared for Ruhin Raghuvanshi... Class III

Monday, 8 July 2013

India & its Cricket: Mirror Image

India & its Cricket: Mirror Image

Much ink has been spilled by many a note-worthies writing on various aspects of this game of cricket, which has long been a passion in India. Keeping with the philosophy of “what others can, I can too - and what others can do better – I can better them too!”… Here I am, trying to bring another perspective to it by correlating the way Indian Cricket progressed over decades to the general/political situation in the country then! This is frankly my father’s thought which I am trying to elaborate upon with my apologetically “limited” views and conclusions along the way.

During Independence – 1930s to 40s
As Indian freedom fighters (the Non-violent group) concentrated on “Round table conferences” with British PM and his delegates around 1930s, and as majority of the country was seething with anger at hanging of Bhagat Singh, Sukh Dev and Raj Guru in 1932 particularly – the first Indian Cricket team embarked on a historic trip to UK, to play their first Cricket series with an international team. It was to be a series with only one test match with English team and that too of only 3 days (against the norm of 6 days prevalent then). They played some 25+ First class matches on the tour though! This test was given official status later-on and is hence officially India’s first official Test Match.

But what a match it turned out to be! Filled with anger and retribution – the Indian fast bowlers wreaked havoc in the famed English batting line-up. The English team was bowled out for a paltry total of 259 on the first day itself! Infact, at one time English scoreboard read 19 for 3 – thanks to some skillful bowling by Indian fast bowlers! India’s fast bowling pack was ably led by Mohammad Nasir and L Amar Singh! Nasir, in first innings of the first test match of India, took 5 wickets… etching his name in the history books as the first Indian bowler to do so! He was fast… really fast and was infact compared to the fearsome Harold Larwood by many English & international players playing cricket then. Phew. That is serious talent. Must be some feeling to make English players duck and jump and then see their stumps shattered! It does not matter that we did not win the test match eventually – no body in the right mind expected that!

In all this, we should also not forget the indomitable captain of Indian team on that tour (and many more after that) – CK Nayudu! He was strong and well-built. He was one of the fittest players of all times – who infact went on to play first class matches (Ranaji Trophies) till the age of 62 yrs.! Beat that! He was aggressive and loved to play attacking cricket. Infact he once hit a six at Edgbaston (England) which landed way outside the ground in River Rhea (in another county “Rhea”). Since then he was known as a man who could hit balls from One County to other!!! He is also famously credited to have suggested to Douglus Jardine the line of bowling that he thought would make run-making extremely difficult and would eventually aid in getting wickets. This seed of thought was later converted into action by Jardine (the English Captain) and which went on to become his famous (infamous?) “Body-Line” tactics – used against Australians! Nayudu by the way was also awarded Wisden Cricketer of the year in 1933 itself! Such was his overall impact!

Anyways, coming back to the first test-match… To the credit of our bowlers – we did almost bowl out England in both innings. We eventually lost due to our batting not being up-to-the mark ofcourse. England won by just 150 odd runs. If not for 50+ scores by their Captain Douglas Jardine in both the innings – the result could have been very different! For a nation taking baby steps into the world of cricket this was a tremendous effort against the country which was the originator of the game itself many years before!!!

Forgive my digression here… ofcourse the intention is not to talk about that test in detail here. However, it was important to understand the psyche/ make-up of the players then to correlate with situation in the country prevailing in those times. Here was a country, which was in shock after shameful hanging of the great sons of motherland. They wanted revenge and were baying for blood of British rulers. That anger reflected in the way our players played that test match. They infact scored runs at a better rate than English team in that match. If ever there was a team that could be called aggressive – this cricket team would come close on top.

After Independence – 1950s
Things changed in the later part of our independence struggle where we increasingly adapted non-violent ways to protest against British rule. Mahatma Gandhi took center-stage in those times. That obviously had a profound impact on the thought process of people in this country. We were calmer and started to learn to curb any instinct to visibly show our anger and replace it with the virtue of tolerance/patience. Well, how could cricket be behind? In came the era of “slower” bowlers. The seeds of famous spin-era of Indian cricket started being sown. What started with Vinoo Mankad, Ghulam Ahmed then continued for few decades to come with many stalwarts donning the role of front line spinners in the team. We will come to the breed a little later.

Note that, even in batting – we started producing batsmen who were more technically correct and would love grinding runs than going aggressively after bowling. We produced batsmen like Vinoo Mankad (who was also an opener along with being a great spinner), Pankaj Roy, Vijay Merchant, Vijay Hazare and so on. Infact, Vinoo Mankad and Pankaj Roy in 1956 scored 413 runs against New-Zealand which was a record then and remained unbroken for another 52 years, when it was finally broken by Graeme Smith & Neil McKenzie of South Africa in 2008! Anyways, the point being that the period of consolidation post-independence on political front, had its reflection on type of cricket we played and the cricketers we produced.

Coming back to bowlers, quiet assassins (non-violent?) cricketers like Subhash Gupte (a spinner, who took 9 wickets in an innings once), Chandu Borde, Salim Durrani, Bapu Nadkarni etc laid the building blocks of the “spin-fort” for us. This was a “breed” that believed in patiently working on bowling out the opponent batsmen. And who did we have as fast bowling option? None… just no one! Infact, I believe, till the advent of Indian cricketers of that era, bowlers would either be called a “Fast Bowler” or a “Spinner” or perhaps a few of them would be called “Fast-Medium” bowlers. But perhaps it was for Indian “fast bowlers” that “Medium-Fast” tag was originally coined. And this often ignored band was led in intervening decades by Polly Umrigar, Dattu Phadkar, Rusi Surti and can you believe it - Ajit Wadekar too! There were a few others who came and went… doing the job of somehow getting the ball “old-enough” for our spinners to take over for the remaining innings/match. Ofcourse, we were treated to some brilliance in between like Ramakand Desai. “Tiny” as he was lovingly called by people who knew him (given 5’4” height with a stout body), this man could bowl deceptively fast and picked quite a few wickets upfront – a rarity in Indian cricket in those times! He for some time was the hope of fast bowling in India who I am sure inspired future generation of Indian cricket aspirants to pick-up fast bowling. Tiny though he was – he was nevertheless heroic. Here was a man who in 1967 (while India was touring New-Zealand) came into bat when scoreboard read 300/8 was bombarded with barrage of bouncers from NZ bowlers Motz and Taylor, from both ends. Remember, batsmen in those times did not have helmets to protect them till then. Anyways, one of the bouncers hit this little man and broke his jaw. His face swell like a pumpkin… yet he continued playing and scored vital 32 runs to gain a lead in the first innings for India. Thanks to that mammoth effort, India finally went on to win the match! People on the ground would remember this tiny man forever - who was knocked out, had blood, had swollen face and was visibly in huge pain… and yet he did not retire-hurt or go away. He continued to face the bouncers and help score those vital 57 runs with No 10 & 11 players in 52 min, came back and bowled a few overs and left smiling at the end. Desai never played for India again.

Defining Phase – 1960s & 70s
But for such small and pleasant digressions – there were not many fast bowlers in the Indian scene. That was not about to change for some more time to come. However, in the meanwhile India was in my view in a very critical phase of its journey as a nation. We had aspirations to be considered global power based on our size and population and unique form of democratic governance. We had also faced 2 massively unnecessary wars (against China and Pakistan) in a span of few years and within the same decade. Our way of thinking, domestic and foreign policies and such defining initiatives were governed by the lessons learnt during war. Leaders then took certain critical decisions which we could execute without much help from others and set into motion various plans to help make the world see what India was capable of and realize that we belonged to the top nations of the world. Steps like critically increasing number of armed forces/personnel, DRDO was provided with unlimited funds to ensure we became self-reliant on defense systems, they initiated nuclear armament program, brought in experts from willing partner countries to build Industries etc.

On the cricketing front too India “discovered” Mansoor Ali Khan Pataudi! He came and changed the entire mindset of Indians playing cricket then. He was perhaps the first aggressive captain we got for a long-long time. He asked Indians to feel proud of the fact that we had some of the world’s best spinners rather than feeling bad about not having any notable fast bowler. This was an important change in the mindset of Indian cricketers. India went on to perhaps become the first country to play 3 – sometimes 4 genuine spinners in the team. These “Spin-hunters” would hunt in pairs and get their prey by meticulously planning their downfall! And you know what – we started “drawing” and importantly winning more matches. In home series, Indian curators were asked by Pataudi to prepare spinning tracks to help Indian bowlers as Australians and English curators did to help their bowlers in their home series. He wanted to win – and he was willing to use/exploit every rule in the book to achieve that. That’s aggressive leadership for me. This approach of Pataudi was an eye opener for Indians. Play fair but use every inch of space in the battleground to lay your plot.

Pataudi became captain in 1962 (while India lost to China in that forgettable war, leaving Indians hurt and angry) and just like whole of India, started defining a new form of playing cricket as Indians got used to living a new way of life. He would always tell his team that nothing but total commitment on the field and playing to win would be acceptable. Without surprise then, India won its first overseas Test under him (in New-Zealand – the same match where Ramakant Desai played that valiant innings) and went on to win 9 out of 40 Test matches he captained – a great record by any standards in those times of Indian Cricket. He was also the one responsible for bringing in the biggest weapons India had had till then - The “Spin-quartet” of Bishen Singh Bedi, EAS Prasanna, BS Chandrashekhar & S Venkatraghvan! Along with Salim Durrani, Pataudi brought the aggression slowly back into Indian cricket – where they were not afraid to loft the ball over the fielders (something of a norm today) or gesturing at opposition players, mocking them on their inability to handle spin and with 5-6 catchers around the bat – letting the batsmen know that their dismissal is all planned and it was only a matter of time! By gosh – India was changing (reflected also in the way India crushed Pakistan in 1965 war). Indian Cricket was following suit!

Whereas, India kept producing reasonably good cricketers in the coming years, there came a man – again short in height, stoutly built, who wanted to be a fast bowler like Desai – but ended up becoming one of the finest batsmen India ever produced. Sunil Gavaskar, was a good reflection of a cricketer who represented changing India – a far more intelligent India, which again had won a fiercely fought war with Pakistan in 1971 and which went Nuclear by 1974! This guy – marginally taller than Desai would bat with Buddha’s calm – but would remain steadfastly resolute while facing upto cricket’s fearsome fast bowlers of West Indies, Australia and England! He would stare back at bowlers; talk back to the opposition in the same tone as they did, would smile when bowlers bowled bouncers – to virtually kill him – since he was difficult to get out! He too played as if he would rather prefer to die on the pitch than give his wicket away. G VIshwanath, Hanumant Singh and even Mohinder Amarnath to some extent were representative of this breed of batsmen. This was very akin to the way Indians in general were in those times. India with its win over Pakistan (in war), was all gung-ho about its military strength. With testing of indigenous built nuclear bomb, it thought of itself as one of the leaders of the global community – which it indeed was given that only 5 countries before that had such capabilities. India always considered itself as a world power frankly and was doing everything in its power militarily, strategically (in UN) and on the scientific front (building industries/arms/weapons and N-Bombs) to keep building on the thought.

However, India was yet to produce a genuine fast bowler. That again was about to change, when another great son of India would serve it and fulfill the yearning need, of not only the team – but of the entire nation. Kapil Dev was by far the fastest bowler India had seen till then. A well-built Haryanvi, with thick moustaches – he quickly brought a lot of joy to Indians who were craving for a bowler who could bowl at the heads of opposition players as they would to ours. Kapil represented the revolutionary youth of the country which had just survived a rule of “Emergency” and who were again a very livid lot. This is the same time when Amitabh had started ruling the roost – and in cinema represented the anger felt by many in real life! It is with same love and passion that people welcomed Kapil into their lives. For them here was a man who showed no mercy, was always ready to fight and would only play to win. Something everyone in those times wanted to be like… especially the youth.

Kapil inspired a host of next-gen fast bowlers and dashing cricketers, like Navjot Siddhu, Kris Srikanth, Sandeep Patil, Ravi Shastri and bowlers like Balwinder Sandhu, Manoj Prabhakar, Javagal Srinath, Venkatesh Prasad etc. India since then has always had one or the other fast bowler who could exploit the initial moisture on the pitch, swing the ball in England like conditions, hit-the-deck and bowl fast on bouncy tracks etc. This fast bowling lot gave Indian cricket the much needed boost for Indians to start winning more overseas matches. Infact Kapil Dev’s entry marked a tectonic shift in the equations of test playing nations. Indian Cricket has never really looked back ever since.

The Transition – 1980s
1982 Asian Games (“Asiad”) and 1983 Prudential World Cup was a big game changer in sporting history of this nation. It was the much needed energy booster this country so desperately needed. We finally felt we could win international sporting competitions and events. 1980s though, on the political front, were a turbulent period in the history of this country… a typical transitional phase. From the time of Gavaskar scoring 36 runs in 60 overs (facing 174 balls) in 1975 World cup match, we were transitioning to an era of run a ball (or even less) kind of display by people like Kapil Dev. Kapil, in 1983 world-cup match against Zimbabwe, scored those famous 175 runs in unimaginable 138 balls (unimaginable i.e. in those times). The country was moving towards more vocal and physical approach in general in India. What with a Prime Minister getting killed for her act of allowing battle-tanks in “Golden Temple”, people demanding more de-controls on economy to compete in the world… Defense scams, Ram Mandir issues, Mandal/ Kamandal issues leading to violent demonstrations! All these were signs that Indians were not ready to take things lying down. They wanted change and they were ready to be the change if need be.

This was reflected in our sports too… especially so in cricket. Players of 80s and early 90s like Sandeep Patil, Kris Srikanth, Ravi Shastri, Manoj Prabhakar, Navjot Singh Siddhu were the transition guys for Indian cricket. They would not sulk under pressure and believed in counter-attacks and abashedly so. Even Gavaskar, legendarily in 1987 world-cup, played that blinder of an innings against New Zealand – where he outscored Srikanth for perhaps the first time! In doing so, he scored his only ODI (One-Day International) century that too “uncharacteristically” – in 85 balls! Coming from Gavaskar – that was way too phenomenal! But such were the times. Siddhu is again a case study of the changing times. In 1983 he played 2 tests for India – and was quickly dropped after being called a “Strokeless-Wonder” (Rajan Bala, who was one of the most celebrated writers on cricket, gave him this name after Siddhu’s debut series). Siddhu resolved to remove that stigma and for years to come he gained in physical strength and mastered the art of hitting sixes (shots played to help the ball clear the boundary rope while in air)! And the result, he got selected again in the team for Reliance World Cup in 1987. His performances in that epic tournament (50+ scores in 4 out of 5 matches India played) made Rajan Bala headline his article in Indian Express as “Sidhu: From Strokeless Wonder To A Palm-Grove Hitter”! That for me is an ultimate transition!

Millennium – Before and after
Yet, there was something missing. It’s like you look at Lord Ram in contemporary times and think – hmmm… there is something missing here… if only he was a little more astute (cunning?), if only he did not believe so deeply in value systems etc. And then you think of Lord Krishna and it’s an “Aaha” moment! He is complete in all sense. He has all those aspects in his character that you would want a man to perhaps have today. Similarly, there was a feeling that something was not right. There was too much of chaos, India was in turmoil in later half of 1980s and we had also lost the Cricket World cup (1987). People felt we were not in the right direction, not changing with times. They needed hope on all fronts, a hope which will take India to next level of growth. Sure enough, from cricketing perspective the Krishna of Cricket was waiting and grooming himself in the backyards and streets of Mumbai. Political field was not so lucky – but a bunch of revolutionary/great thinkers and policy makers came together to make the India that it is today. And mind you, the change started in late 1980s when Prime Minister VP Singh heralded some key initiatives into his Government policies that were to change the face of the nation for ever (implementing Mandal commission recommendations on reservations to SC/ST and Backward Classes for example). He was clearly challenging the existing social framework. In cricket too, a boy who was challenging the current establishment (established cricketers) and who at the age of 16 years was hitting bowlers like Kapil Dev out of the ground in Ranaji Matches. He was none other than the most adorable son of India – Sachin Tendulkar… the Boy, the God and the phenomenon!

Sachin changed the equations in the Indian dressing room. So much so, that this awestruck, button-eyed boy quickly became the cynosure of all eyes in India – and a painful thorn in the ones of opposition teams. Much like Sachin in his first test (where he got hit by a Pakistan’s Waqar Younus bouncing delivery, but continued to play with blood on his shirt), India too was bleeding with most of the youth on streets protesting against the reservations. Sachin though quickly became the backbone of Indian cricket team and took India to next level of growth. He started scoring centuries after centuries and battering every other bowler (especially the ones who would be foolish enough to publically incite or challenge him). As a result, India started winning their matches more regularly.

Something similar was happening to India too – with Congress Government bringing in fresh wave of revolutionary economic policies, in the process liberalizing the foreign investment path to India. Old & stale, state-controlled economy establishment were slowly being dismantled… layer by layer. India quickly though set itself loose on path of growth to stumble & correct itself… fall and stand back again. With social fabric re-aligned and economy now set on a winning track – India never looked back. It was a true progressive model – one that retained its old charm of cautious roots of the past albeit also opening its arms to welcome the world descending on the Indian Market! No wonder we were likened to and Elephant – who is cautious while taking every step forward – but when it does, it sure leaves a deep imprint and never looks back! On cricketing front too, new crop of Indian cricketers emerged – many of them came – showed aggression and intent – but perhaps lacked the talent to succeed at international level. But in the process, Indian team got a settled look eventually where a Sachin, Ganguly, Sehwag, Jadeja, Prabhakar, Kumble etc would be the aggressors whereas Md Azharuddin, Rahul Dravid, VVS Laxman, Sanjay Manjarekar, Srinath, Arshad Ayub, Venkatesh Prasad etc would be the more old-fashioned characters who would bring tranquility to the proceedings.

Over time, as India took its economy and military strength from mid to high level growth in late 1990s & early 2000s – Indian cricket saw emergence of players like Harbhajan Singh, Yuvraj Singh, Md Kaif, Zaheer Khan, who were far fitter, were willing to take risks and in a lot of occasions converted impossible situations into a winning one! This was indeed the “nuke” generation of India. Along with Sachin, Ganguly, Anil Kumble they wanted to just blast the opposition away every single time! However, to represent the serenity of then PMs Atal Behari Vajpayee and Dr Manmohan Singh, there were people like Dravid and Laxman, who served the game selflessly and with dedication & humility, staying away from controversies – yet providing that important reassurance every time team needed.

In Present times…
After almost one and a half decades of economic growth – the needs of the nation were changing. Mere economic belligerence did not make them feel happy. They wanted to “rule” the world and be heard. The Mittals, Tatas, Airtels, United Spirits of the country did just that. They went on a shopping spree and started acquiring international companies’ big time – and reputed ones at that. In cricket, this era of ruling the world came to be represented by none other than Mahendra Singh Dhoni’s team. Here was a man who started playing cricket late and who, once he got selected, quickly closed the doors of Indian team for any other wicket-keeper batsmen in the country! If there ever was a player and a captain who completely represented the people and fulfilled their thirst & hunger to be at the top of the world – it is Mahendra Singh Dhoni. He came, he saw, he truly conquered – and thankfully for many in India – he is still playing! He has won every known cup/competition that is being played in world-cricket. He is talented, he is laborious, he has attitude and yet he remains calm in adversity – always looking for ways to win. He even smiles when others find it difficult to come out of a lost match. He smiles because he has the confidence of winning for India every other time.

This team under Dhoni has the eternal hunger it would seem to win matches. They are aggressive, are far more clever sportsmen than their previous generations… they know they are the gifted ones & they just do not fear losing! The country continues to step into new territories and win them over invariably. Ofcourse internationally, India’s image was dented by some catastrophic corruption scandals and scams and so was our cricket team in the same period when they got washed out in couple of big series (England and Australia)! But India soon regained its ground on the economic front with wave of new policies and so did the Indian Team – which went on to win the World Cup and recently win missing Champion’s trophy!

Summarizing...
India continues to show healthy growth rate when major developed countries have had negative or a flat rate! Similarly, while quality of cricket in some other nations seems to be reducing, India with its mammoth production machinery of cricketers is producing gems after gems. What more can one say about the synergy? It has been an interesting journey of evolution of the country and so it has been for cricket here. Today we are one of the top countries in terms of economic growth, investments, infrastructure development, educated/skilled people, armed forces, nuclear capabilities, etc. Indian Cricket team too is the top team in ODI and in top 3 in Test Matches!

As I bow every single time to every small achievement of the country – I stand and applause, jump with joy, party and silently thank every player of my cricket team – every time they win crucial matches and international tournaments. Both have truly given me my identity and immense sense of belief and confidence to face up to the world.

Its Montoo..
10th Jun 2013’ to 4th Jul 2013’

Ps: As stated at the start this article itself was originally written by my Dad. I have only added a few more details and made it “as usual” longer (from his 2 pages to my 5+). But I hope I have been able to keep the essence of his thought intact and that he will forgive me if I exceeded my brief!

Wednesday, 15 August 2012

Olympics 2012: Indian Badminton - Poem for Kids

(A poem for recitation program - prepared for my daughter)

My Name is ............ and my topic for recitation is:

"Olympics 2012: Indian Badminton"


It is that time again, when we all play games!
London 2012 is upon us, as the 30th Olympic Games!

83 Indian athletes will play 13 different games
But my all time favourite is the Badminton game!

As everyone cries olympic motto "Faster, higher, stronger"
I will pray for Saina staying there longer

When Jwala & Ashwini play on rectangular court
They use their racquet like a sword in a fort

Kashyap and Diju hold the racquet amongst men
They treat the court as their personal den

As the opponents get webbed in the Olympic ring
Badminton lovers in India will dance and sing

When they smash shuttlecock over Net
Badminton medal for India - will be a sure shot bet!

Motto of this Olympics is "Inspire a generation"
It will surely be so for our Indian Nation!

Jai Hind.

Thank You.
--24th Jul 2012
--By Mantosh Singh..

Monday, 10 November 2008

Saurav Ganguly – A True Hero

Rarely do we see an Indian fall and rise time and again and then to finally fall to roar back up with vengeance. He, a man who inspires loads of self-confidence amongst others; a man who faced adversity with fiery fury and converted them into inspiration; a man to whom “impossible” was just another term in the dictionary. This man of destiny is, Saurav Chandidas Ganguly. A man who we have all loved and hated at various times, but a man who has scripted innumerable number of inspirational stories on his way to success.

Around 20,000 runs in more than a decade of non-stop international cricket, 5 years as Indian team captain, the only captain to lead Indian team to World cup Finals in the last 2+ decades, The originator of the famous “team huddle” in the middle of the cricket ground, the only player in India after Sunil Gavaskar who declared his retirement plan well in advance. It is difficult to start describing this man – the Hero of millions. Yes Sir - for all his achievements – this man is my Hero too. Forget his flaws – as all great men have their share of those. If ever this country had a hero – This gentleman sits amongst the top ones.

Saurav, which means “one in a hundred” (in his mother tongue, Bengali), has given us great joy in his long career of 113 test Matches and more than 300 One day internationals, spread over 11+ years (in international arena). I still remember the afternoon when Ganguly walked in to bat in his Debut test at Lord’s Cricket ground. With English bowlers having an early breakthrough – Ganguly was always under pressure. And with highly successful Vinod Kambli (a regular player in test matches in those times) being injured, one always thought Saurav was a stop-gap replacement and with his “attitude” problems reported way back in 1991 tour of Australia – this guy would not play another test Match after this. His failure was a long drawn conclusion. He was taken-in only to complete the playing eleven in that match. Oh - how wrong everyone was?! The world that day, dear friends, watched in awe as this new kid hammered boundary after boundary, announcing his arrival on the international scene like an Emperor. He caressed one boundary after another on the off-side, through the covers and along the ground – piercing field placements at will. Before long – he had completed a remarkable century - on Debut. Rahul Dravid, who was also making his debut in that match (and scored a well made 92 runs in the same innings) was his partner for most of that innings and as Rahul aptly put it later – there is either God or Saurav Ganguly on the off-side of the cricket ground. Ganguly, meanwhile, continued to “hammer” his critics and went on to score another century in the first innings of the next match to became only the 3rd batsman in the world to score centuries in the first 2 innings of a career. It was a dream start for a player. And to achieve all this after he was “dropped” unceremoniously earlier (without playing in a single Test match in the 1991-92 tour, of India to Australia) on the pretext of having “attitude problems”! Beats sense. In-spite of this initial rebuke from selectors and despite his failure in his debut One-Day International against West Indies in 1992 (where he scored only 3 runs) – he fought back. And how?! Just as any great fighter would – by grabbing the next given opportunity to play. After four years of wilderness and hard work – it took guts to come back and score two consecutive centuries. What a wonderful-wonderful player!

He holds many records in the cricketing arena, like being the first Indian to have scored an ODI century in Australia against Australia, he along with Sachin Tendulkar holds the record of highest amount of runs scored as opening pair, has most number of centuries in ODI (22) after Tendulkar (amongst Indians) and 4th highest in the world (Tendulkar is followed by Ricky Ponting and Sanath Jayasurya), he is the only Indian captain to have led the Indian team for 5+ continuous years with consistent overseas wins in England, Pakistan, West Indies, Australia, New Zealand, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, he is the man who led the Indian team that broke the famous winning streak of “murderous” Australians in 2001 (helped by famous innings of VVS Laxman in Kolkata). Those are the ones I distinctly remember – there are many more records that a player becomes a part of (by playing international cricket for a decade or more), which I am sure you will find in innumerable number of websites and news dailies. I will not bother you with every single statistics here.

Look at his career though and you will see that we were blessed to have got a player like him. It goes without saying that Indian Cricket would have been poorer without a Sachin, Dravid or a Kumble. But Indian Cricket would, today, be struggling without the inspirational leadership of this one man – we all know as Maharaja, the Tiger or lovable Dada. It was when everything seemed lost after Australian series of 1999, when Australia beat us fair and square (in Australia, under the captaincy of Sachin) – that this man was chosen to lead the team (on this day, the 10th of November, of 2000). Those were horrible times with Match-Fixing allegations flying thick and high and Indian Cricket definitely at its lowest ebb. How ironical that Saurav will say good-bye to International cricket on the same date – i.e. 10th Nov 2008. Destiny? Perhaps. Anyways, after becoming Captain, he tasted first blood in form of Test series win over South Africa in 2000 and then against Australia (in India), in 2001. He never looked back from then on. He went on to consistently lead India to test match wins, both overseas and at home. He picked his bunch of players – all of whom were young and hungry – and built a “dream team”. Let me jot down a few incidents that I think truly define the leadership onus that he took upon himself. He was the one who convinced Virendra Sehwag to open in Test Matches – the benefits of which we are reaping till today. He was the one who sacrificed his opening combination with Sachin to give Sehwag the mantle of opening the innings in One-Day Internationals. This, even though he had a successful, world record partnership going with the “Legend”, Sachin Tendulkar. He was the one who (in 2003 Indian tour of Australia) walked in at number 4 position, in the evening of the “First day of the First test match” in Brisbane to shield Sachin Tendulkar from facing the wrath of McGrath and Gillespie. Which captain of a team would even dare to do that in the first test match of the series on the first day? He knew all too well that his “perceived” weakness against genuine fast bowling was something the opposition will exploit and if he were to get out cheaply and that too to a bouncer delivery – his critics would jump and say “we told you so”. He would end up looking foolish then to have even thought of guarding someone as great as Sachin Tendulkar. But again – in a crushing answer to his critics – he went on to score a century in that innings! That is how Ganguly was and that is what sets him apart from any of the Indian Captains till then and ever since. A Leader, who was not afraid to face challenges and who, if required, was ready to catch the bull by the horns even under fire! I can see streak of such traits in our current Captain Mahendra Singh Dhoni – who by the looks of it is on the way to lead Team India in many matches to come.

Alright, remember the World cup of 2003? India had lost their group match against Australia by a whopping 9 wickets (after being dismissed cheaply for 120-130 odd runs)? The whole country was vying for the bloods of the Indian team and more so of Saurav Ganguly – the Captain. I still remember the worried faces of the Indian team shown in media after the loss to Australia in their second pool match. Saurav, as captain, could have easily avoided facing the media and let the other members of the team face the wrath and fury of the nation through the media. But that is not how Saurav lead his team. He took the responsibility of talking to the media and respond to every single punch from them with his chin held high. As a captain – he kept his wards away from those blood sucking wolves on the prowl and kept the team united and motivated. Now that, Sir, is the sign of a wonderful and a great leader. Another decision to prove his support for his chosen team came in form of persisting with Mohammad Kaif in the playing eleven. Mohammad Kaif’s house was ransacked back home in India (by agitated fans of the game) and he was being made the scapegoat for what should have been seen as a collective failure of the entire team. Ganguly as a Captain – stood by Kaif and made him play in all the matches of the World cup from then on. Kaif proved his mettle and had consistent match winning scores from then on – to lead India to historic World Cup Finals. That we lost in that World Cup Finals should not have caused too much of botheration, as Australia were far superior in those times and for us to have won the finals, we needed “The lady luck” as the 11th player, playing that day in the Indian team. That was not to be. But the whole World Cup series brought forward another aspect of Ganguly’s leadership skills – his care and protection of his wards. A basic lesson taught to all the leaders in Management courses. To be a great leader - you have to have the courage to shield your army from any attack, both from within and outside. And Ganguly proved just that in the 2003 World cup series.

All the above are incidents that may seem insignificant and perhaps may not have been noticed by general masses – but these were for me the golden steps taken by a great leader. For me that group of players, from different regions of our vast country, became “Team India” during that series. The entire team seemed united under the able leadership of Saurav Ganguly.

Life, however, had another struggle scripted in the tale of this player though. He was “beaten”, humiliated and thrown out of the team after test series victory in Zimbabwe (against the host nation in 2005). It came as a body blow – not only to Ganguly as a player and a Captain – but also to all his admirers like us. And to know that it was a conspiracy hatched outside the playing ground – was deeply annoying and extremely frustrating. But then, not for anything is this man revered by his fans – he kept quiet and with the energy and vigor that only great men posses, he worked hard. He worked extremely hard – willing/waiting for that one chance to get back into the team where he belonged as a right. After India were beaten “with a cane” to lose 4-0 against South Africa in ODI series (in South Africa) – there was a call for bringing back Saurav Ganguly. He got the chance, in form of Test Match slot, “against” the wishes of scoundrels like Greg Chappell, Dravid, the previous Cricket Selection Committee (With that “Lilliput”, Kiran More at the helm) and ex-cricketers like Ravi Shastri etc. And did he prove to be the savior for the team? Yes Sir – he did. He was the highest scorer in the first test match against South Africa. He led India to a test match victory – the first by an Indian team in South Africa. A dream comeback was once again being written for this warrior. He scored at will in that series and was the highest Indian scorer there. He then went on to make 3 centuries in 2007 (including a double century against Pakistan). Even his farewell series (against Australia) has turned out to be a dream with one century and 2 half centuries. Is this the man we were after to quit the game? We certainly treat fighters and heroes “very well” down here in our country. Huh.

A man who scores at a rate of more than 50 Runs per innings/match in both forms of the game (Test Match and ODI, in 2007) and who has overall scored more than 12000 runs in One-Day Internationals, is dropped from ODI team under the pretext of bad fielding standards and non-performance! Well as the song goes, “It happens only in India”. Come to think of it – I can’t remember a single catch that Ganguly has dropped in the last 2 years – a memory that is still fresh. I can’t remember too many incidents of him misfielding in any match over the last 2 years. The ones that he has have been genuine mistakes that almost all the fielders make sometimes. Haven’t we seen Robin Uthappa, Sehwag, Rohit Sharma etc misfield? Look for evidence in Australian and Sri-Lankan ODI Series i.e. if you have had a temporary amnesia attack for some reason. In fact, Saurav has taken 100 catches in his ODI career. For someone who was not a regular in “slip-cordon”, he has done remarkably well, i.e. as a fielder, to hold on to those many catches. Is this the sign of a “bad” fielder? For devils’ sake – look at the other side. He is only the 3rd ODI player in the history of the game to have scored more than 10000 runs, taken more than 100 wickets and has more than 100 catches to his name (Sahcin and Jayasurya being the other two). Not even Ricky Ponting – who is definitely a better fielder than Ganguly and who has played equal or more number of matches as Ganguly has – has managed to take more. And to top it, Ganguly has scored many half-centuries and centuries, at an excellent strike rate since his return to ODI team in 2007! What else do you want a player to do? Not everyone can be a rabbit on field. Is Sehwag a great fielder? Is Yuvraj Singh anywhere as close to a good fielder that he once was? What is the use of having 10 good fielders – but not one of them scoring runs when required? Take a look at all the ODIs played by the Indian team in the last 1 year and you will find that we have won matches because of the “Bowlers” most of the times. Our batsmen have been found wanting in almost all the matches (except for some brilliant knocks by Sachin in VB series finals against Australia). If not for Dhoni’s knocks in most of the ODI matches, in the last one year, we would have struggled to post decent scores. So why drop a decent batsman from your team? Young legs? My foot. Let those intelligent selectors take a long walk to hell – for all I care. We shall see how many of these young “greats” like Yuvraj, Raina, Dhoni decide to retire in time – i.e. before they grow “old”. To say that seniors should make way for youngsters is just a bloody “catch line” I say. Let the damn “juniors” of today first become consistent enough to become “seniors” in future, and THEN we shall see how many of them are “great” enough to decide on their retirement. It is easier to tell others. We shall see how these “Youngistan Turks” feel about retirement when they reach 33-34 years of age. Oh boy – I can’t wait for that period to come. I am sure I will live long enough to see their reactions then.

See – Sachin, Ganguly, Dravid, Kumble and Laxman are “GREAT” players – great men. They have a certain way of thinking and we mortals just cannot even “begin” to imagine how their mind works. That is why they are “great”, whereas we aren’t. We have no business to compare them to ourselves and expect them to follow all principles (flawed or otherwise) that we believe in. They have achieved greatness by applying their body and soul to the purposes of serving their nation in their own capacity. And anyone who has served the game for over a decade (as these men have) should be well respected and honored. That we, like wolves, hang our tongues out to drink their blood (in their time of despair) does not show us in good light.

Players like Sachin Tendulkar are perhaps born once in a generation. But it will not be wrong to say that players like Saurav Ganguly are born once in many-many decades and leaders like him are even rarer to find. For the joy that this shirt whirling, outspoken, left-arm batsman (and leader) has given to every citizen of this country – I say we salute him. Give him every ounce of accolade and tribute that he truly deserves.

I may not follow the game of cricket as much as I have followed in my life after he leaves. There won’t be too many great players of my time left for me to watch. There definitely won’t be Saurav Ganguly to look for, playing those exquisite cover drives on the field! For such extreme emotions for the game – I thank you Sir. I shall eventually pass on the “baton” of “cheering with maddening emotions” to the next generation. We have to be consistent with Cricket Selectors after all i.e. to keep the game “youthful” overall. This game perhaps will be well served by new set of patrons who have fresh voice (to shout), fresh legs (to jump around in joy), fresh nails (to chew upon), fresh eyes (to keep them glued to the TV screens) and fresh expletives (in times when the team does not perform well!) to take the new crop of cricketers forward! I hope the game prospers in this country and keeps our man’s legacy intact.

As my kids grow up – I definitely won’t be looking up the Indian history books for inspirational super-hero stories to tell them. I just need to close my eyes and play back the saga of Saurav’s cricketing career and I know my kids would have learnt a lot by the time I finish his epic chronicle. I could not have found a better story to tell them. And for that – I thank you again Saurav.

Thanks a lot for all the good memories you have given us and wish you all the best.

Its Montoo..
(6th Nov 2008-10th Nov 2008)

Tuesday, 10 April 2007

Indian Cricket – My View

Indian Cricket team has generally evoked some strong emotions from all insane Indians like us. We just love to hate this game and the more we hate – the more we talk about it and the more we talk about it – the more we hate it. There is a special bonding between this set/bunch of 15 different players at different times and this bond keeps getting stronger. Did you notice the word “Hate” in the above sentences? Well – that is only because we just lost a major tournament. This word will be replaced with “Love” in all the above sentences the moment our team wins a major tournament again. Till then – “Hate” expression is “in”.

Post mortem has begun and has indeed been going on for some time now on the “whys and hows” of our loss in the 2007 World Cup. I had been disturbed by some blatantly atrocious views of people. Well, I had to go back to some statistics/figures to really look for answers. Unfortunately, not many News channels, experts and the big talking analysts have cared to go into the statistics of Indian performances in the last year and hence all their arguments are bordering on vagueness and their own personal choices. I have collated some data for you to ponder. Once you have seen the statistics ask yourself – did we really look like a team that could win a major tournament? I hope the statistics would show you why I even bothered to collect them. And mind you – I have taken all the One-day series that India has played under our “Great” coach Greg Chappell. Read on.

First Series under Greg Chappell:
-          In Aug 2005: India Tour to Zimbabwe:                  ODI Played – 7; Won – 5

Rahul Dravid named the new captain, replacing Saurav Ganguly:
-          In Oct-Nov 2005: Sri Lanka tour to India: ODI Played – 7; Won – 6
-          In Nov-Dec 2005: South Africa tour to India:         ODI Played – 5; Won – 2
-          In Feb 2006: India tour to Pakistan:                      ODI Played – 5; Won – 4
-          In Mar-Apr 2006: England tour to India:                 ODI Played – 7; Won – 5

All seemingly going well for India while playing IN India (exception being the Pakistan series). Now check the following trend from May 2006 onwards:
-          In May 2006: Indian tour to West Indies:               ODI Played – 5; Lost - 4
-          In Aug 2006: Indian tour to Sri Lanka:                   ODI Played – 3; Abandoned – 3
In Sep 2006: Indian tour to Malaysia (DLF Trophy with West Indies and Australia as other teams):                                                ODI Played – 4; Lost – 3
-          In Oct 2006: Champions Trophy in India:             ODI Played – 4; Lost – 3
-          In Nov-Dec 2006: Indian tour to South Africa:       ODI Played – 4; Lost – 4

Return of Saurav Ganguly
-          In Jan 2007: West Indies tour to India:                  ODI Played – 4; Won – 3
-          In Feb 2007: Sri Lankan tour to India:                   ODI Played – 3; Won – 2

World Cup 2007
-          In Mar 2007: World Cup:                          ODI Played – 3; Lost – 2

Let me ask you again then – did we really look like a team (with the past performances listed above) that could win? Do you see a trend in the above statistics? Warning bells should have started ringing from May 2006 itself. Don’t you agree? Look at the figures given above all over again. C’mon there is no rocket science here. The figures “are”, and dare I say, “were” glaring at us for last 10-11 months. Our wonderful people in Selection Committee and the great BCCI kept following the famous Gandhian principles (The one’s that tell us not to “look”, not to “say” and not to “hear”) and hence never rose (in unison) against this falling trend. And when they did – it was too late. The damage had been summarily done.

Before I move on, let us also recollect the reasons/logic that Greg Chappell, his stooge Rahul Dravid (who also is our Team’s Captain still – unfortunately) and the Lilliputian “Chairman of Selectors” of those times (our very own “Vibhishan”, Kiran More) gave to the country for persisting with the members of the losing team, series after series; losses after losses. They said – “…We need to build the nucleus of a young team and we need to persist with them to give them confidence…”. We were also told about the records of some of these youngsters, and how the team consists of Match Winners and how well they had performed “earlier”. We were told that the young members had “class” and they will succeed “inevitably”. Class? Hmmm… This bunch of classy players (that these people accumulated) sadly never delivered the “inevitable”. Huh. We were banking on players who were not able to score a single 50 in more than 2 years? Or the bowlers who had not taken a five wicket haul in more than a year or so? On top of everything – they kept playing some atrociously average players in the name of them being younger and better fielders than the one’s being ignored for selection. They kept playing this bunch of non-performing idiots for five continuous series (from May 2006 onwards) without even contemplating the repercussions of their actions. They lived in hope of performance, which (looking at the “class” of the players we were “persisting” with) was evidently not going to come through.

I have my own thoughts on the subject and I hope you will spare sometime to read them.

So, we did go wrong, but where?
Firstly, I think we lost time by NOT dropping the non-performers straight away. However young a team member is – if he is not able to perform with the bat and/or bowl – he will not win you matches “regularly” with his fielding ability alone – however great he is on the field. And no, we still do not have anyone like Jonty Rhodes in our ranks – so stop dreaming. Moreover, even if you had a brilliant fielder – you also needed him to contribute either with bat or bowl. Even Rhodes used to score an odd 50 and a hundred while batting and was lightening-quick in scoring those runs. I mean what is the point of having a good fielding side when they can’t bat or bowl when required of them? I am sorry to say – but by saving 10 runs (at an average) per match and by scoring only 10-15 runs (at an average) makes your score only 25-30. I don’t think these are enough runs against a player’s name to justify his selection in any international team. And the likes of Suresh Raina, Venugopal Rao, Md Kaif etc looked out of the major league frankly. They SHOULD have been dropped in favor of either Saurav Ganguly right in middle of 2006 and/or replaced with some other so-called “younger” players. Similarly, Zaheer Khan should have been brought long back into the team. Irfaan and Ajit Agarkar type of bowlers should have been dropped. But we persisted with them, and persisted too long, at the cost of the team’s interest.

Secondly, I strongly felt we should have thought of removing Greg Chappell as a coach or at the least should have asked him to fall in line, to bring back some sensible order to the team’s progress. I have had some strong feelings about this man from day one of his assignment and have always felt that his acceptance of assignment as Indian Team’s coach had more to do than met our eyes. I have always had this uncomfortable feeling about him as if he was out here on a mission to destroy the winning combination that we had till the last world cup (2003). I will try and justify to you the basis for such thoughts. History shows that by 2003 – we were the ONLY side that looked like the one that could beat Australia. We were the number 2 ODI Team in the world, and were closing in on Australia. But – as history will also record – it took just one wrong move from the BCCI to destroy the fabric of that team and made it into one of the worst today. As is famously said - He came, he destroyed and he left. Yes Sir, he destroyed the Number 2 side of the world and converted them into a bunch of losers by the time he left. As any tactician would tell you, the best way to demoralize/destroy a group is to kill or deface the leader/most popular man in that group. Well, Mr. Greg started his stint with some unsavory comments about Sachin Tendulkar. Unfortunately, he picked the wrong guy to target and had to retract as soon as he landed in India for his assignment. He then picked the Captain of the team and called him all the “names” that any honorable man would not tolerate. He publicly humiliated him by “leaking” the famous “e-mail” and gave a couple of interviews, which he later conveniently disowned as not being his. All this was done to firmly set an impression in front of the world of a mad man in charge of the Indian team. Things would still not have gone bad had our board/selectors seen the cleverly orchestrated moves of this brilliant tactician and had thwarted his attempts by either continuing with Saurav Ganguly as captain or removing Greg as coach. None of that happened though and that for me was one of the major turning points in the history of Indian cricket. Saurav was humiliated and removed. Greg Chappell was praised for his outlook and “Vision” for Indian cricket. He then went on to continue to play and support the bunch of some non-performing players till the very last. Backing them in the name of his now famous “Process”. It will hence not be an exaggeration to say that the much talked about “Process” of his, was primarily meant to break this Indian team into a lame unit, filled with ever conniving team members with average abilities and in the “process” making an energetic fighting unit into a bunch of losers. Today he has left the job he had undertaken 18 months back, satisfied in the thought that he has done what he had come for. Just look back at his backing for Irfaan Pathan, Suresh Raina, Md. Kaif (till the very end), Virendra Sehwag, VRV Singh and even Harbhajan Singh. Perhaps then you would start seeing this the way I look at it. And friends, do not forget that his backing for such players was not limited to a game or two. It went on for match after match, series after series, till such time that a new Chairman of Selectors had to shut him up and force the return of Zaheer Khan, Anil Kumble and Saurav Ganguly. But again, this happened too late and too close to the start of the World Cup 2007 and hence was rendered almost ineffective. We lost badly in the World cup. Thus, Greg’s mission, of bringing down the side that had challenged the Australians (our Coach’s motherland) in the last world cup was successfully achieved. With his job done – he promptly resigned and is happily on his way back home – satisfied and content. We, however, are left back collecting the ruins lying around. We still have not gather enough courage to blame him for the loss and the BCCI has (strangely) gone ahead and showered praise on this man for his vision, his help, his gestures, his methods, his co-operation etc etc. Has anyone asked them a simple question – “Why”? Are they scared that he will write a book and expose the lethargic functioning of BCCI and hence don’t want to instigate him? I mean on one hand we put all the curbs we can on the players who play the game and shower praises on the Coach of the side who incidentally is, for me, THE primary reason for the shocking state of Indian cricket today. And yes, for people who feel a coach is helpless if the team does not perform on the field, I say – shut up. I mean, how can we take this crap? If the coach cannot go and play in the middle, he cannot inspire the players to play well, he cannot help the players struggling for form, he cannot help the team bond together and win – what is he good for anyways, only to make impressive presentations? Why have a coach at all then? I am sorry, but such argument feigns cowardly traits. How long can we take such sick arguments anyways? Strange. Absolutely bewildering to say the least!

Thirdly, as is very evident – the BCCI and the selection committee should accept the blame and apologize to the people of this country. They spend time in politicking rather than doing something worthwhile for the benefit of the game. The spineless people who are part of the BCCI and the selection committee should either resign or alternatively, they should get their act together to come up with “meaningful” steps to kick-start a new beginning for Indian Cricket. We Indians however have lost all sense of that “famed” moral value that we once possessed (and for you who don’t agree to this judgment can look in the mirror and tell themselves that they do). Hence, to expect these scoundrels to vacate the space for more honorable people would be a futile exercise. So the least we can expect them to do is that they do something sensible for the good of the game. To take one example of how spineless they can get – consider what happened in 2005. The bunch of selectors in 2005 and 2006 were really a shameless bunch. I mean, they did not flinch even once before disowning their own player in favor of a damn Australian, who we could see was conspiring against our own Captain. As I have already noted above and as I am sure history will record - that one act (of removing Saurav Ganguly, both as Captain and as a player, at the insistence of Greg) created the much talked about rift in the team. A team that was known to have gelled together pretty well till then suddenly became a disjointed unit. The originators of the famous “huddle” were lying in ruins. And all this was because our selectors believed too strongly in the “Atithi Devo Bhava” slogan. A typical case of we Indians putting our tails between our legs and running after everything that a foreigner threw at us – and yes – with our tongues hanging out. It is often said – an ally of a conspirator is an equal party to a shameful act and hence these selectors (Rahul Dravid included) cannot escape that blame. We perhaps are the ONLY country in the world that followed advices of a Foreigner coach to crush our own heroes. And the likes of Ganguly, Tendulkar are heroes of this generation, have no doubt about that. Its no wonder then that people are scared to be named as heroes in this country now. No body would want to live in the fear of being conspired against and stabbed. Would they? I felt awful seeing our new Captain and that Lilliputian, Kiran More, demeaning our own cricketing heroes at the insistence of a foreigner. I could not help but feel disgusted. The feeling of repugnance I am sure was same for all the freedom loving Indians during the British rule, when they would see the Britishers using our own men to beat us up – making it more humiliating. Such Indians are a disgrace to the nation and anyone who supports them are adding to the disgraceful powers.

Fourthly, the great media cannot escape the “honor” of being major party to the sad state of cricket in India. These people are in the habit of grabbing any quote from a foreigner and justify the claims made by him/her. “Atithi Devo Bhava” again? Hmmm… Lets take a few examples of how they have contributed to the conspiracy. When Greg said “…Tendulkar is over and finished as a great player” – these media men ran around the world to look for the opinion of the former players. Aired those that corroborated Greg’s comments. They went ahead and did their own analysis. They juggled around with a lot of figures to finally conclude that Sachin was “indeed” not good enough anymore and should finally rest his bat. And mind you, this was way back in 2005 when Greg took over. Take another instance. Greg said – “We need to build the nucleus of the team with young players. Such young players would be more athletic and hence be better fielders”. Well, this was too long a statement to give to Indian Media anyways. The circus started immediately! These “we know all” type of Media men started jumping around. They collected some irrelevant data and deciphered them in their own way to show to the world how ineffective our senior players were and how poor our fielding was (again mind you, these same players had reached the Finals of the World cup just a year or so back). After all the heavily loaded analysis they concluded that Aah! These senior pros were indeed tortoises and hence should be removed. And here, seniors meant only Ganguly and Kumble. All the others like Rahul, Sachin, Sehwag were oh such swift fielders!! I mean, these media people can go to any length to make or break an image of a person. And to support them in their mission, there are any numbers of past players who are ready to say what the channels want them to. That gives credibility to media’s lopsided, unjustified reports/analysis. In all this, we should not overlook how effectively Mr. Greg used the powers of our media. All his e-mails, SMS, “personal views” to personal friends are part of now folklore stories. With the players not able to clarify their stand (due to gags against speaking to media) – Greg was free to play his games in getting his way. I must say here, the electronic media in India is lecherous. They need to be reminded of that famous old saying – With great powers come greater responsibilities. There is nothing much that can be said otherwise.

And finally, we as the patrons of the game are as much responsible for the state of Indian cricket today. Why – if I may ask, should we be so critical of the team that has but lost couple of games in a given tournament? Is it the fault of players that we did not see “it” (the loss) coming? We should have been more conscious of the statistics – shouldn’t we? Why blame the cricketers alone? That they were not playing well for a long-long time was there for everyone to see. If you still penned your hopes on them – it was your fault really. Why blame them so much? Again, why, if I may ask, are we jealous of the money they earn? Isn’t it ridiculous? How does it matter to anyone of us even if they earn billions? Have they ever questioned your earnings? You never give a damn about the companies that you jump around for 30-40% hikes? Why? If someone were to question you on the reasons that you left an “X” company to join a “Y” company – you would be shameless enough to tell everyone that “Y” offered you more money and hence you jumped the job. So? It is ok for you to get the right of earning as much money as you want – but not for these players? How lecherous can we get really? This is too bloody much. Also, are we all foolish enough to buy the argument that the players don’t perform well because they spend their time doing advertisements? I mean foolishness would be a mild word if you indeed would want to believe such crap. The problem is, we always believe that “we” are the people with best attitude and that our cricketers just don’t care about winning. Again, are you really of that mindset? Get yourself checked for devil’s sake. We will never know the feeling that one goes through while representing one’s own country. That is simply because most of us have never done that. So just stop questioning a player’s commitment to the team and their genuine efforts to win a given game. Look around friends, the game of cricket has changed and changed a lot. Haven’t you noticed? Gone are the days of players with 5’4”-5’8” height. Today cricket has become of game of powerful men, men who are taller and who are stronger. The talented, small sized players will win you some of the matches once in a while – but to win consistently – you need more players with good physique. Look at Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, England – they are teams with players who are almost all over and above 6 ft. Another proof of what I am saying is the list of top 10 raters in batting and bowling (in ICC ranking). They are 95% players who are physically well built and stronger. Till we find such players, we shall continue to have our bad days more often then the good ones. Getting the picture? Stop blaming the players for not trying then. They are just not physically up to the “changed” international standards at the moment. Can’t you see? So what do we do then? Throw away all the players at one shot would be your answer – wouldn’t it? But I say – No. Persist with the best in the lot and wait for that special talent to come through the ranks and then go about winning consistently. To demean a player is never the solution. They have worked hard to be a part of the Indian cricket team and they deserve respect for all the hard work that they must have put in to reach that level. If we keep abusing the players as we do in times of distress, and if we keep bullying them – they would be ashamed of being an Indian. Do you really want them to feel that because of your act of vendetta that you perpetuate on their honor? I say, be guarded against any attempt to question the morality, the commitment and the honor of players who represent the nation on our behalf. Put yourself in their place and perhaps you will know what they must go through when you raise such venomous slogans and noxious abuses on them. The least we can do is to have reasonable expectations from our players, and being their patron, be a part of their sorrow as much as you are a part of their happiness. Treat them with respect that they truly deserve and if we can’t do the basic minimum of showing respect – we better shut our mouth for good. And hey, stop talking about the constitutional rights of freedom of speech. If the makers of the Constitution knew that this nation would someday have poisonous creatures like us – they would never have allowed such a fundamental right to be a part of constitution. So shut up.

I can also go on and talk about the players and their performances that led to our losing the matches. But I do realize that no one has suffered more than the players and they know they have not done justice to their own talent and as a result have missed a big chance. I won’t dwell into that aspect anymore than is already obvious.

What can we do now?
Well for starters – stop thinking of being like Australians. You can’t be like an Australian when you are born in India and vice-versa. I don’t think Australians ever tried to be like West Indians when they started re-building their teams just because West Indies were the world-beaters then. They devised their own methods to succeed. And so should we. We can and we should build the team our own way. Again, there is no need for an Australian to tell us what to do.

It is time we learnt from the fate of our National Game, Hockey. We were world champions in Hockey till 70s. We had the artistry and the skill like no one else. Europeans came along and changed the way the game was played. The game became faster and more physical. We tried to keep pace with them and won some games through our skilled and artistic moves. But that was not to last for long. We started losing pretty much regularly over a period of time. We then thought of playing the way the Europeans did and started to imitate their training schedules and tried to match their speed. But their physical abilities were superior to us and hence we found that we could not keep up the energy levels for the entire game. So we then did the next best thing, we hired a European coach to learn some European tricks. That move failed miserably. Today we are in a state where we no more have the natural ability that we had in this great game of hockey, the artistry and craftsmanship have vanished, the skill has all but deserted our players and on top of that we have still not found stronger players to match the physical strength of European players. The result is – we mostly end up playing for last two positions in major tournaments. Reasons for me are very obvious; perhaps we were wrong in trying to replicate the methods of Europeans on ourselves. They could never have the skills in Hockey that we had in those times and hence they devised their own strategies (that rested more on the physical abilities and faster game, than rellying on crafty moves) to beat us. Lesson to be learnt here is perhaps to go back to our roots and pick up people who have the good old hockey skills and who are physically stronger. An Indian Hockey team with 5-6 physically strong, tall men and the remaining team having the best of hockey skills would be ideal match-winning combination for an Indian team. Till we do that – we will lose more than we win.

If we understand this, and put the lessons learnt in hockey to cricket, we shall be on the right path to start with. MRF Foundation created to train budding talent has been running in India for more than a decade and Dennis Lillee has been coaching there for all those years. We still don’t have a tear-away fast bowler in our ranks – do we? Hence, lets look at what best we can do with the players that we produce. That would give us some answers. In the quest of being like someone else – we are leaving our own identity behind and in a sense ridiculing our own abilities that are on offer. It is time we should start trusting our own selves really. It is time we re-invent that love for the game and stop looking at all things in black and white. Give the players who represent us in the team the respect and support they need and you will see that we will start producing better cricketers and better results in future. These people like Sachin, Saurav, Dravid, Kumble have given better part of their life to bring joy to our lives. Give them a chance to help resurrect themselves. We will son be among the top teams once again – there never was any doubt about that and there never should be any doubt even today.

Would like to end with an appeal though. All I would like to say is, it would be appreciated if you all were to be more cautious before demeaning your own countrymen (our own players in the current context) – especially when they are themselves demoralized. It does not reflect any good on us when viewed by the international community. Don’t also jump to adverse conclusions about your own people just because a foreigner tells you so. Cricketers in India have brought enough happiness in our lives. It is terrible on our part not to show our gratitude to them for such wonderful memories that they have given us. If we keep making their life miserable every time they lose – I am sure the parents of today will not encourage their kids to take up this wonderful sport (as has already happened to Hockey). That would, for me, be suicidal for the future of this sport in our country.

And finally, I hope I won’t be writing 15 years down the line repenting the state of cricket as a sport then, because of some insensitive handling of our cricketing heroes in this era. Let us save Indian Cricket from going the Hockey way. Its up to us

Think about it.

Mantosh Singh..
10th Apr 2007’